HTTP headerinjection is a technique that can be used to facilitate malicious attacks such as cross-site scripting, web cache poisoning, and more. These, in turn, may lead to information disclosure, use of your application in phishing attacks, and other severe consequences.
One of HackerOne's latest submissions examines a tabnabbing protection bypass for a URL parser HackerOne operates as the conduit between nearly 1,500 organizations Check this post to learn the difference SQL Injection Saldırısı veya Veritabanı açığı saldırısı olarak ta bilinen ve halen birçok site için geçerli olan yöntemin güvenlik amaçlı kendi siteniz üzerinde nasıl ...
When enableHostsWhitelist is set to true, the protection against the hostheaderinjection is enabled. In this case, enter a list of the host servers that are trusted. You can enter multiple hosts, separated by a semicolon (; ). The default value is false. Repackage and redeploy the Decision Center and Rule Execution Server archives.
This is a very bad idea, because the HTTP Host header can be controlled by an attacker. This can be exploited using web-cache poisoning and by abusing alternative channels like password reset emails.
In short, I think host header injections that result in an immediate 301 basically have no associated risk at all. If you’re an attacker, you are probably much better served by trying to convince a user to click your phishing link than to leverage a host header injection attack on a
